Google+
Рейтинг@Mail.ru
Pravda.ru

World » Asia

Iran: Haven’t We Seen This Movie Before?

12.04.2010
 
Pages: 12
Iran: Haven’t We Seen This Movie Before?

In the joint interview* with Hillary Clinton and Robert M. Gates on Sunday, the buzz words were all there: international terrorism, Al Qaeda, Iran’s nuclear program, the need for UN Resolutions and the fact that such Resolutions will not stop the USA from taking further action, an international coalition being built, Teheran not wanting to follow the diplomatic path…and Iran was mentioned no less than eighteen times.

The build-up, ladies and gentlemen, is on. We have seen it before and we are seeing it again. Look at a map of Iran (large photo) and the mechanisms are in place. And now the rhetoric is taking the same path as the run-up to the war in Iraq. Take for example the recent interview (source quoted below) between the NBC’s David Gregory and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and US Defense Secretary William Gates on Sunday April 11, 2010.

During the interview, Iran was mentioned, directly or indirectly, no less than 18 times, ten ominously by Defense Secretary Gates (5 directly and five indirectly – “they”, “them”), 6 times by the interviewer and twice by Hillary Clinton.

While there were references to “putting pressure” on Iran and a mix of policies including economic sanctions, the images created by this interview are as telling as they are shocking and frightening: we have all the ingredients present in the verbal and body language of the United States of America visible immediately before the Iraq war.

Let us see:

The manipulation of fear. Ingredients: “nuclear terrorism”, “Al Qaeda” and the next topic? Iran.

Hillary Clinton laid the foundations, the interviewer introduced the feed and Robert M. Gates provided the veneer, a carefully worked out triple-whammy starting with international nuclear terrorism: “The threat of nuclear terrorism has increased” (Clinton); “We know that terrorist groups, primarily Al Qaeda, persist in their efforts to obtain…nuclear material (for a dirty bomb)” (Clinton); “We’re doing everything we can to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons” (Gates).

Gratuitous phrases such as these without an iota of foundation or credible sources are no more than scare-mongering so as to lay the cornerstones for a campaign of the manipulation of fear which gives administrations a carte blanche to act as they please, firstly eliminating foreign businesses from any possible tenders (except those chosen carefully from a tidy alliance of friends, the NATO arms lobby), then the move in for the kill and finally the doling out of billionaire contracts to White House cronies. Oh, and slaughter hundreds of thousands of people in the process while another State which cannot fight back is destroyed.

The risk from international nuclear terrorism has always existed since nuclear weapons were created and what better example of nuclear terrorism than Hiroshima or Nagasaki? Let us call a spade a spade. The risk was far higher during the time of the voluntary dissolution of the USSR because materials were being moved around and controls were less easy to exert through a shift in centralization.

As for Al Qaeda, its capacity to act amounts to a few wannabe idiots with sugar and weedkiller type devices, almost out of date, a demented half-wit trying to set his shoes on fire and a Nigerian banker’s son with a desire to have a burning crotch. So from there to rocket science, passing through Iran, does not make much sense and it is frightening that the US Secretaries of State and Defense are speaking as if it did.

Us and Them. We are the good guys, they are the bad guys. See? They don’t wanna play ball.

“We’re probably going to get another Security Council Resolution” (Gates); “The fact that Iran…(has) not responded makes our case” (Clinton); “We stretched out our hand…It was the Iranians who refused” (Clinton).

Melodramatic drivel. We saw how much the USA and its lackeys respect the UNSC, because they only use it to justify their own ends and if the UNSC says no, they press ahead anyway. Under international law, a separate resolution by the UNSC is necessary for any resort to force, and those concerned know it.

The fact that Iran has not responded is not the case, clearly. The Islamic Republic of Iran has met the USA face to face on a number of issues but reiterates that it has the right to a peaceful nuclear program. And now that the USA is so worried about Iran’s nuclear program, how come nobody speaks about Israel’s 200 warheads sitting in the Negev Desert, which (bring out the orchestra) “Israel does not confirm nor deny”. See the smaller picture.

So why is the USA not playing the same tune with Israel? Or is it that the USA is actually controlled by Israel and the epicentre of the USA’s policy-making process is in fact in Tel Aviv?

A UNSC Resolution would not stop the USA and its allies from going further

“As Secretary Gates just said, the Security Council Resolution will not in any way forestall us or the E.U. or other concerned countries from taking additional steps” (Clinton).

I rest my case. No further comment.

As with WMD, the perceived threat from Iran is enough to merit military action

Pages: 12
| More
5484

Popular photos

Most popular

Will Russians sell their soul to American devil for piece of parmesan cheese?
Will Russians sell their soul to American devil for piece of parmesan cheese?
The West imposes sanctions on us based on one simple thing. In their opinion, in 23 years, the Russian society has turned into a consumer society, which, in general, does not care where to live, what...
US not Pro-Nazi, just Anti-Christian
US not Pro-Nazi, just Anti-Christian
Although middle-America is conservative with sound Christian values its government is not. Last Friday the UN General Assembly passed a resolution against the promotion of Nazism. The majority of...

Video

Popular photos

Система Orphus