By Mark S. McGrew
Author's note: If any of the links in this article do not work, please copy the phrase in (parenthesis) and paste into the www.google.com search window.
The Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Beau Biden has a very good reason to want to take away the powers of arrest from the sheriffs in Delaware: FEAR.
Absolute fear is the motivation. The Attorney General and a host of Delaware politicians and government employees are terrified of one lone sheriff.
Sheriff Jeffrey Christopher believes that sheriffs do have the power to arrest and always have had that power. Here, you will learn that he is correct.
New Castle County Sheriff Trinidad Navarro is a liar, a coward and a traitor.
Kent County Sheriff Norman Wood is a liar, a coward and a traitor.
Georgetown Delaware Chief of Police William Topping is a liar, a coward and a traitor.
Any other government employees that say a sheriff has no arrest powers or wants to eliminate those powers is a liar, a coward and a traitor.
They are playing a treasonous game to try to eliminate the arrest powers of a sheriff because, right now, today or tomorrow morning, any Delaware Sheriff has grounds to arrest the Attorney General and some of the legislators of Delaware for Fraud, Sedition and Treason, because of Biden's and your legislators attempt to circumvent the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Delaware and lying about it. That is deadly business and they know it. That is why they must get rid of the sheriffs.
Sheriffs are employed by the voters, citizens of their county, charged with the duty to support and defend the Constitutions of America and the State of Delaware. They can and should arrest anyone, government employee or otherwise, who attempts to violate those constitutions.
Your sheriff can arrest an FBI agent, DEA agent, IRS agent, any State Trooper, the Georgetown Chief of Police or any government employee if he is breaking the law in your county. Go to google.com and type in ...sheriffs resist the federal government. All over the country, sheriffs are telling federal agents to pack sand.
This explains the power of your sheriff: (Oregon Sheriff Gil Gilbertson Gives Federal Agents The Boot: Feds Have No Jurisdiction!)
This is an excellent 8 minute video on (the movement of Sheriffs to take back America.) That is what Biden and his co-conspirators are afraid of.
The City police wouldn't even dream of risking their career and paycheck by arresting a corrupt mayor. A State trooper is too much of a coward to put his career on the line by trying to arrest a corrupt politician or government worker. His supervisor doesn't want to lose his job and the head bosses of the Delaware State Police will not risk losing their cushy jobs, their pensions and their power. ALL law enforcement officers in the State of Delaware are sufficiently bribed and cowed to do what they are told, "Or else."
Who's going to fire a sheriff for doing the job that cops don't want to do? The only people who can fire him are the citizens of his county. The only reason they are going to fire him is because he abuses them or refuses to protect them from the criminals.
Truthfully, if Sheriff Jeffrey Christopher went on a sweep and arrested every crooked politician with his hand in the cookie jar, Beau Biden would have to close his windows to not hear the cheering coming from the citizens down in Sussex County.
Nobody likes crooked government employees. The Sheriff is the only law enforcement officer who can actually arrest those thieves and not worry about losing his job, benefits and pensions, like very other person carrying a badge and a gun in the State.
Of course a crooked government has to get a crooked Attorney General to wipe out the Sheriffs. Sheriffs are the only effective enemy a crooked politician has.
2,000 years ago, a man respected by 70% of Americans, made these statements: "Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered."
For all the church leaders reading this and want to tell their congregation that Jesus never said that, look it up. All I will tell you is, you can find it in the book of Luke.
For all the lawyers who will refuse to believe it, you're no different than hundreds of lawyers I have told that to and refused to confirm it......just like Jesus said you wouldn't.
Here, I will prove to you that nothing has changed in 2,000 years.
The Sheriff of Sussex County and the other two Sheriffs have the legal and constitutional Right to convene a Common Law Grand Jury, composed of Sussex county citizens at 9am, totally apart from the State's oversight. It is NONE of the State's business.
Once the Grand Jury begins to hear the evidence, the Sheriff can go outside and deputize 200 citizens. They can drive to Wilmington and when they arrive, make a call to the Grand Jury and ask if an indictment has been given against Biden. If the answer is "Yes", the Sheriff can then proceed to the location of Biden and arrest him and transport him to the Sussex County jail and incarcerate him until trial. Anybody, including State Police who interfere, will do so at their own risk.
Then the Sheriff can convene a Common Law trial with a citizen jury, without a judge or prosecutor allowed. If that trial finds Biden guilty of Sedition or Treason, the Sheriff can apply whatever penalty that jury determines, up to, hanging by the neck until dead, one Beau Biden.
It is all legal and completely in standing with the United States Constitution and the Delaware Constitution. We have over 300 years of precedence in Delaware to support that action against corrupt government employees.
Sound crazy? Then you need to call US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and have him committed.
He ruled in the case of United States vs. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992):
"Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, Hannah v. Larche, 363 US 420, 490 (1960) with J. Frankfurter concurring in result, the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right."
"In fact, the whole theory of it's foundation is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between Government and the people. Although the Grand Jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, it's institutional relationship with the Judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm's length. Judges direct involvement in the Grand Jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the Grand Jurors together and administering their oath of office".
And in an article in the Creighton Law Review, Volume 33. number 4, 1999-2000, Roger Roots, Juris Doctorate wrote:
"In addition to its traditional role of screening criminal cases for prosecution, common law grand juries had the power to exclude prosecutors from their presence at any time and to investigate public officials without government influence. These fundamental powers allowed grand juries to serve a vital function of oversight upon the government. The function of a grand jury to ferret out government corruption was the primary purpose of the grand jury system in ages past."
After Biden's body is cut down, the Sheriff can lead his deputies to arrest every legislator who supported Biden's Treasonous act and prosecute them the same way and hang every one of them. And the "State" has nothing to say about it. The State is the citizen's of Delaware. Politicians, judges, Attorney General and his deputy attorneys are nothing more than part time employees of the citizens.
And they make a heck of a lot of money lying to you.
852 of your Delaware government employees make over $100,000 a year. Look at (salaries of Delaware state employees) .
Compare their salary to your at the (Delaware per capita personal income.)
The State of Delaware, like most nations on Earth, recognizes the citizen's Right to make arrests against law breakers. Citizen's arrest is as old as cave men. Figure it out: What came first? People or lawyers? People or cops? People or judges? It is not rocket science. It is just that you have been lied to for so long that you've been trained to believe a lie.
The 1987 Delaware Attorney General's office issued an opinion written by State prosecutor Eugene Hall and Deputy Attorney General Peggy Hanrahan, which the Attorney General, Charles B. Oberly III, signed off on, giving his approval, regarding the powers of arrest that security guards may have. You can see it here: (Attorney General Oberly citizens arrest in Delaware) On that site, scroll down to see the Attorney General's answer to the letter.
In that opinion, the Delaware Attorney General's office said, "We conclude: 1. Private security guards only have the same common law power of arrests as private citizens, 2) security guards can detain individuals pursuant to 11 Del. C 840, 3) some hot pursuit may be permissible under the common law but it is not advisable and 4) their [private security guards] investigation and interrogations are limited by 24 Del. C. 1301. There is no statute in Delaware regulating the arrest powers of private citizens."
In 1964 in the case of State vs Hodgson, Del. Super, 200 A.2d. 567, the court stated: "at common law a private citizen could make an arrest without a warrant for an offense committed in his presence which amounted to a breach of a peace...or which threatened a breach of a peace"
Attorney General Oberly further stated, "As a private citizen, the security guard can make arrests for breaches of the peace or threats of such breaches. A breach of the peace is defined as, a public offense done by violence, or one causing or likely to cause an immediate disturbance of public order. The necessity for prompt on the spot action in suppressing and preventing disturbances of the public peace justifies arrest without warrant in cases involving a breach of the peace."
"Examples of breach of the peace include, 1) an affray or an assault, 2) disorderly conduct. 3) a refusal to depart premises and 4) swearing at another. At common law the arrest power included the power to detain the individual.
A sheriff is classified as a "Conservator of the Peace", under Article 15 of the Delaware Constitution, written in 1831, it says:
ARTICLE XV. MISCELLANEOUS §l. Conservators of the peace.
Section l. The Chancellor, Judges and Attorney General shall be conservators of the peace throughout the State; and the Sheriffs shall be conservators of the peace within the counties respectively in which they reside.
In the recent opinion from the Attorney General's office, which was NOT signed by and approved by Biden, probably because he does know it is treason, we see State Solicitor
Mr. Lawrence W. Lewis stating, "The Constitution does not define the powers of a "conservator" of the peace," and dictionary definitions offer little guidance".
Well Larry, here's what they must have left out at your law school: The constitution is not a dictionary. The constitution was written by men who wrongly assumed that lawyers in the future would #1. Know how to read, and #2. Know how to look up big words in a dictionary. And #3. Not be getting their legal instruction from watching COPS and CSI.
He says the "conservator of the peace has never been defined" That "dictionaries offer little guidance. See Black's Law Dictionary (rev. 4th ed. 1968 at 368"
Lawrence W. Lewis is a blatant liar. By association, so is Beau Biden. I did look it up in Black's, Larry.
Jesus was referring to the "Beau and Larry Show" when he said, "Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered."
By the way, Lawrence Lewis gets paid $119,000 a year to lie to you.
Here is the text from Black's Law dictionary that Beau and Larry are hindering you from seeing. Notice the 3rd sentence says: "Their duties were to prevent and arrest for breaches of the peace,"
Here we go to Black's Law Dictionary (rev. 4th ed. 1968 at 368, the same one that Larry could not find a definition in: CONSERVATORS OF THE PEACE. Officers authorized to preserve and maintain the public peace. In England, these officers were locally elected by the people until the reign of Edward III, when their appointment was vested in the king. Their duties were to prevent and arrest for breaches of the peace, but they had no power to arraign and try the offender until about 1360, when this authority was given to them by act of parliament, and "then they acquired the more honorable appellation of justices of the peace." 1 Bl. Comm. 351.
Even after this time, however, many public officers were styled "conservators of the peace," not as a distinct office but by virtue of the duties and authorities pertaining to their offices. In this sense the term may include the king himself, the lord chancellor, justices of the king's bench, master of the rolls, coroners, sheriffs, constables, etc. 1 Bl. Comm. 350. See Smith v. Abbott, 17 N.J.L. 358. In Texas, the constitution provides that county judges shall be conservators of the peace. Const. Tex. Art. 4, § 15; Jones v. State, Tex. Cr. App. 65 S.W. 92. The Constitution of Delaware (1831) provides that: "The members of the senate and house of representatives. the chancellor, the judges, and the attorney-general shall, by virtue of their offices, be conservators of the peace throughout the state; and the treasurer, secretary, and prothonotaries, registers, recorders, sheriffs, and coroners, shall, by virtue of their offices, be conservators thereof within the counties respectively in which they reside. [Black's Law Dictionary (rev'd. 4th ed.) (1968), p. 378 (emphasis added).]
And, THAT, is the key of knowledge that Lawrence W. Lewis and Joseph R. Biden, III have intentionally kept you and hindered you from learning.
Part Two will be coming soon. Thank you!
Mark S. McGrew
How is Russia going to respond? Last time, an attack of this scale on the Crimean Bridge led to the beginning of the destruction of the Ukrainian energy system