The resolution of key issues surrounding Ukraine is approaching a critical moment. Will it be resolved diplomatically, or will military action remain the primary path?
As a condition for reinstating the Black Sea Grain Initiative, which previously allowed the export of both Ukrainian and Russian grain (with Russia's participation blocked), Moscow has demanded that Rosselkhozbank (Russian Agricultural Bank) and other key banks be reconnected to SWIFT international payment system.
However, since SWIFT is headquartered is in Belgium, it operates under EU regulations, making EU's stance crucial in determining Russia's access.
On March 26, major EU leaders reaffirmed their refusal to lift sanctions on Russia:
EU extends sanctions every six months, with the next extension scheduled for July. Technically, Hungary – which previously opposed extending the sanctions – could again threaten to block the extension unless Russia's SWIFT restrictions were lifted. There are indications that other countries may also push for this revision.
At the same time, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested on March 26 that Russian banks could indeed be reconnected to SWIFT. He stated that "all options are on the table" – Donald Trump could either lift or strengthen sanctions against Russia.
However, existing US sanctions tools are limited, and lifting them would not bring immediate leverage over Russia. In fact, such a move could escalate bilateral tensions rather than force Russia into a peace agreement.
This could also hurt Trump's political capital, given his peace-oriented campaign messaging on Ukraine.
To bypass SWIFT, the US may propose an alternative:
However, Russian banks would need to establish subsidiaries in the US, and cross-border payments would be slower than through SWIFT.
One way or another, the moment of truth is approaching.
If Washington moves toward lifting financial sanctions on Russia, diplomatic negotiations may advance alongside military actions.
However, for diplomacy to fully replace military engagement, Russia's core demands (primarily territorial issues) must be met – something Moscow will not compromise on.
On the ground, there is no indication that Russia sees a need to negotiate from a position of weakness.
The Russian Army continues to advance, while the Air Force (VKS) has adopted new tactics targeting Ukrainian supply hubs and military deployments.
Daily drone strikes (Geran UAVs) hit key locations in major cities:
These strikes suggest that the Russian General Staff has ambitious offensive plans.
The US must act swiftly. Otherwise, Washington may run the risk of coming too late to colonize what remains of Ukraine.
A payment system is any system used to settle financial transactions through the transfer of monetary value. This includes the institutions, payment instruments such as payment cards, people, rules, procedures, standards, and technologies that make its exchange possible. A payment system is an operational network which links bank accounts and provides for monetary exchange using bank deposits. Some payment systems also include credit mechanisms, which are essentially a different aspect of payment. Payment systems are used in lieu of tendering cash in domestic and international transactions. This consists of a major service provided by banks and other financial institutions. Traditional payment systems include negotiable instruments such as drafts (e.g., cheques) and documentary credits such as letters of credit. With the advent of computers and electronic communications, many alternative electronic payment systems have emerged. The term electronic payment refers to a payment made from one bank account to another using electronic methods and forgoing the direct intervention of bank employees. Narrowly defined electronic payment refers to e-commerce—a payment for buying and selling goods or services offered through the Internet, or broadly to any type of electronic funds transfer.
Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS!
Error page url:
Text containing error:
Your comment: