British woman not to use frozen embryo

The European Court of Human Rights ruled Tuesday that a British woman became infertile after the treatment for ovarian cancer has no right to use frozen embryos to have a baby without permission of the sperm owner.

The court's Grand Chamber, a panel of 17 European judges, confirmed an earlier ruling by a lower chamber upholding a British law that stipulates consent from both parents is needed at every stage of the in vitro fertilization process, as well as for the storage and implantation of the fertilized eggs.

Natalie Evans, 35, had filed the case claiming the British law breached her rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. She said her right to privacy and family life, and the embryo's right to life, were being violated by the decision of her former fiance, Howard Johnston, to withdraw his permission for use of his sperm. She had also argued his attempt to block her having the baby was discriminatory.

But the court said there was no violation of the convention, and upheld its earlier ruling that said it was up to national law to define when the right to life began. Under British law an embryo does not have independent rights or interests.

The court said it felt "great sympathy" for Evans but ruled that her desire to become a parent should not be accorded greater weight than her former partner's right not to have a genetically related child with her.

Evans was left infertile after receiving treatment for cancer, but in 2001, prior to the removal of her ovaries, six of her eggs were fertilized by Johnston's sperm through in vitro fertilization.

The couple then split up, and Johnston withdrew his consent for her to use the embryos. Evans took him to a British court, but judges there rejected her legal appeals to implant an embryo, saying consent from both partners was needed and ordering the destruction of the embryos.

The European court requested a stay of the destruction order in February 2005 while it considered Evans' case. Tuesday's verdict is final and cannot be appealed, meaning the frozen embryos will have to be destroyed.

Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS!

Author`s name Angela Antonova