Offended husband sues his wife

She was married to a plumber, but then fell in love with a millionaire. The woman chose the rich guy. They were married. The plumber sued.

A court awarded him damages of more than $750,000 (527,050 EUR).

Now Jerry Fitch Sr. wants the U.S. Supreme Court to step in and limit what a spurned spouse can collect through a lawsuit that claims "alienation of affection."

Fitch said he should not have to pay $112,000 (78,705 EUR) in punitive damages, citing an earlier high court decision overturning state criminal laws against gay sex to bolster his case. He is not contesting the rest of the judgment.

The Supreme Court in the state of Mississippi called the matter a classic case of "he said/she said/the paramour said."

Mississippi is one of only seven states that still allows lawsuits by people who claim someone stole their wife or husband.

The claim is rooted in the antiquated notion of a woman as her husband's property. Most states have abolished alienation of affection as a basis for lawsuits.

Sandra Fitch, the woman in this case, was married to the plumber, Johnny Valentine, when she was hired by Fitch's real estate company.

Within a year, she and Fitch began an affair. She became pregnant by Fitch, but she told Valentine his suspicions about adultery were unfounded.

Soon, though, Valentine had his proof in the form of genetic testing that showed he was not the baby's father. He sued for divorce and then he sued Fitch, who is worth $22 million (15.4 million EUR), according to the Mississippi Supreme Court.

The purpose of such a suit, the Mississippi high court said, is "the protection of the love, society, companionship, and comfort that form the foundation of a marriage."

Valentine said his marriage was normal until Fitch entered the picture. Sandra Fitch - she married her boss in 2002 - said she began her affair because she was unhappy in her marriage.

Fitch, who also was married at the time the affair began, initially denied that he was the father of the baby, that he was involved with his employee or that he was giving her extra money.

He eventually acknowledged his role.

A jury awarded Valentine more than $750,000 (527,050 EUR), including $112,000 (78,705 EUR) in punitive damages. The state Supreme Court upheld the verdict.

"There is simply no rational basis for state sanctioned punishment of intimate association between consenting adults," Fitch's lawyer said in a filing asking the U.S. high court to block payment until it decides whether to grant Fitch's appeal.

Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS!

Author`s name Angela Antonova