Britain has descended into bloody chaos as emboldened migrants continue to fuel public outrage. White men, many believe, can no longer tolerate what they see as the authorities' double standards, even though speaking out carries the risk of professional and social reprisals.
On June 8 in Belfast, a 30-year-old Sudanese man attacked a local white resident, inflicting severe knife wounds and reportedly attempting to cut off his head. The attack sparked protests that soon escalated into clashes with police. Demonstrators set fire to cars, buses, and houses occupied by migrants.
WARNING! The raw video of the attack in Belfast is available here. The video is extremely graphic and disturbing! Viewer discretion is strongly advised!
Earlier, in Southampton, a Sikh man attacked first-year student Henry Novak, stabbing him five times in the chest. According to reports, police officers who arrived at the scene failed to notice the fatal wound and instead accepted the migrant's account, in which he accused Novak of racism. The publication of video footage showing officers placing handcuffs on Novak triggered mass protests against London's migration policy. In Southampton, those demonstrations also descended into riots and confrontations with police a week before the unrest in Belfast.
The essence of the problem, according to critics, is that migrants have become an electoral base for Europe's current political regimes. The more migrants arrive, the more votes ultimately go to globalists. Not all migrants receive voting rights immediately, but many eventually do. In Britain, citizens of the Commonwealth of Nations — comprising 52 countries — are entitled to vote if they possess any lawful permission to enter or remain in the country.
Such policies have led many among the native population to lose trust in the state altogether. Humanitarian ideals may sound morally appealing to many Europeans, but a state is not a charitable organization. When people come to believe that the interests of outsiders matter more than those of the native nation that built, finances, and sustains the state, a sense of injustice inevitably grows and eventually turns into revolt.
Meanwhile, calls to defend national borders, culture, and accepted standards of behavior are routinely branded as "racism" across Europe. Opposing migration can create serious career risks. Any statement made by a white Englishman or Irishman that migrant colleagues interpret as hostile or as creating a "toxic work environment" may result in disciplinary action or dismissal.
If such an employee publicly criticizes migrants, companies often choose to part ways with them in order to avoid customer boycotts or accusations of encouraging xenophobia. Employers frequently scrutinize candidates' social media profiles. Strong posts about migration often become an unofficial reason for rejecting a job applicant — a so-called red flag.
For that reason, there were no large-scale protests over the scandal involving Pakistani men who, for decades, allegedly targeted underage white girls, lured them into alcohol and drug abuse, raped them, and sold them into sexual exploitation.
Yet violence against white men sometimes becomes the catalyst that breaks public restraint. Each new wave of protests, such as those that followed the tragedies in Southampton and Belfast, eventually translates into votes at the ballot box.
As a result, right-wing and anti-migration parties — including National Rally in France, Alternative for Germany, the Party for Freedom in the Netherlands, and Reform UK in Britain — have moved from the political fringes to become major political forces.
It is entirely possible that globalists have dug their own grave with the hands of migrants. The growing trend toward the election of nationalist governments may ultimately bring to power forces that prioritize their own populations, halt migration, and reshape relations with Russia on a pragmatic and mutually beneficial basis.
Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS!