In the night of May 11, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed that Kyiv begin direct negotiations as soon as possible, resuming the "Istanbul format" talks that were interrupted in 2022. In response, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky demanded that Moscow agree to a 30-day ceasefire starting on May 12 as a necessary condition. He also added that he would personally travel to Turkey and wait there for the Russian president.
By breaking the agreements made three years ago, Kyiv has created even more problems for itself. In addition to the previously reached understandings, Moscow will now demand recognition of its control over the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. With his proposal, Putin has successfully challenged the West, causing confusion among many politicians.
Predictably, President Putin rejected the opponent's ceasefire plan for a 30-day truce in the conflict zone. Speaking to journalists on the night of May 11, he ignored the proposal and firmly pointed out that Ukrainian forces (AFU) had consistently violated all previous ceasefires — the Easter truce, the Victory Day truce, and even the 30-day moratorium on mutual energy strikes proposed earlier by the United States. Thus, there is clearly no trust in Kyiv's proposals. Putin called things by their names — defining the conflict as a war, not a "special military operation.”
The president proposed that the Kyiv regime return to direct peace negotiations — without preconditions or intermediaries — which it had interrupted in late 2022 in Istanbul.
Putin emphasized that what is needed is a sustainable peace, not just a truce. And this is evident not only from the current conflict but from all others. Ceasefires in Gaza, in the Indo-Pakistani conflict, fall apart like houses of cards the moment they are announced, because there is no consensus on the core confrontational issues. For Russia, those issues are the denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine, NATO's refusal to integrate it, the end of Western aid to "Nazis," and the restoration of the "Russian world" in Ukraine — which, according to this view, will never again exist within its 1991 borders.
The choice of Istanbul is likened to bringing a criminal back to the scene of the crime — to extract a confession and repentance. But this time, the punishment will be harsher. Should Kyiv refuse, then capitulation in Kyiv will follow. The choice of Istanbul also represents Putin's outstretched hand to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who holds significant influence in the Black Sea region. Turkey's Haber channel ran a front-page story titled "Turkey — Center of Reconciliation, Talks Will Be Held Here,” accompanied by a photo of Putin and Erdoğan shaking hands. Indeed, Putin understands the subtleties of the East very well.
The proposal from the Kremlin will not be accepted, because peace is not in the interests of Ukraine's Western patrons. What they want is a pause in the Russian offensive — to collect their thoughts, preserve themselves, and protect the remaining Ukrainian resources, which Russia will not allow them to keep once it claims victory. The capitulation of Nazism is inevitable, and the temporary leaders of Europe will crawl back into their burrows, having learned to respect Russia. As for Zelensky, his fate will be different — millions of people will curse him.
This scenario must be recognized in the West, because NATO countries are currently unable to fight Russia, producing four times fewer shells collectively and lacking experience in modern warfare. They are faced with a well-trained Russian army, supported by loyal allies ranging from China and North Korea to anti-imperialists across every continent. Africa, for example, is systematically cutting off the West from its resources in favor of Russia and China. It is no coincidence that many African nations were prominently represented at the recent Victory Day celebrations.
Germany has a debt-to-GDP ratio below 100% among NATO members. There is also no real sense of readiness for war — otherwise, their economies would have already been mobilized. What we hear instead are rhetorical threats and the demonization of Russia, which only shows a lack of respect.
Istanbul is the largest city in Turkey, straddling the Bosporus Strait, the boundary between Europe and Asia. It is considered the country's economic, cultural and historic capital. The city has a population of over 15 million residents, comprising 19% of the population of Turkey, and is the most populous city in Europe and the world's 17th-most populous city. The city was founded as Byzantium in the 7th century BCE by Greek settlers from Megara. In 330 CE, the Roman emperor Constantine the Great made it his imperial capital, renaming it first as New Rome (Ancient Greek: Νέα Ῥώμη Nea Rhomē; Latin: Nova Roma) and then finally as Constantinople (Constantinopolis) after himself. In 1930, the city's name was officially changed to Istanbul, the Turkish rendering of εἰς τὴν Πόλιν eis tḕn Pólin 'to the City', the appellation Greek speakers used since the 11th century to colloquially refer to the city.
Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS!