For months, Google and its partners in an agreement that would allow the company to create a big digital library remain unmoved by a rising tide of opposition. Google and its settlement partners — the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers — argued that the agreement would not harm competition, and said they were confident that it would be approved in its current form by a federal court.
But the Justice Department, in a filing on Friday, made clear that the parties were busily negotiating modifications that would address some of the concerns raised. Those negotiations are likely to accelerate now that the Justice Department has said that it too believes the settlement raises serious legal issues and has urged the court not to approve it without changes.
"We are considering the points raised by the department and look forward to addressing them as the court proceedings continue," said Google, the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers in a joint statement.
The Justice Department acknowledged in its filing that the deal would give Google a virtually exclusive license to millions of books which are either out of print or whose rights holders are unknown - so-called 'orphan books'.
But it said that the deal would have great benefits, and that it hoped it could be amended to make it fairer - for example, by giving some of Google's competitors accass to these same orphan books. It also said that Google could improve matters by securing agreement from the rights holders for out-of-print books, rather than being allowed to go ahead by default, TG Daily reports.
In the meantime, the list of Google foes is growing. Besides Microsoft, Amazo and Yahoo! have also thrown their weight behind the Open Book Alliance, the group formed by Reback and Peter Brantley, director of the Internet Archive, a nonprofit Web-based information depository. And on Sep. 18 the U.S. Justice Dept. joined the chorus of critics, urging the court to shoot down Google's proposal in its current form.
The filing echoes fears voiced by Reback and the other parties the attorney has helped rally to the cause. Amazon, maker of the popular Kindle e-book reader, wants to avoid losing share in the nascent electronic-books market. Microsoft frets that Google will gain an unfair advantage in online advertising by having a massive, searchable library of books associated with its search engine.
Russia does not deliberately attack supply lines in Ukraine that supply Western weapons. It has found a new, much more effective and less costly way to destroy it. So say the authors of the Chinese Sohu.