In what feels almost scripted, two of the world’s leading harbingers of anxiety – The Financial Times and The Washington Post – have suddenly begun singing in unison: Ukraine, they say, should stop hoping for “miracles” and start preparing for a Russian summer offensive.
It is summer – heat, dust, and the perfect backdrop for the active phase of war. After all, armored vehicles warm up faster under the sun. The Washington Post warns: Russia could seize the moment and launch such a breakthrough that the entire West will simply exhale and drop its portfolios of sanctions in stunned silence.
American and European officials peek out from behind stacks of analysis papers and nod gravely: yes, indeed, “it’s all heading that way.”
In its characteristically dry tone, U.S. military intelligence states that without peace negotiations – or at the very least a fresh shipment of “magic pills” from NATO – the conflict will gradually drift in Russia’s favor by 2025. Of course, they never forget to add, “It’s all very expensive” – perhaps to soothe the worried reader with the notion that someone, somewhere, is paying for this.
Retired British General Sir Richard Barrons chimes in with a spoonful of mustard realism: “Russia is slowly seizing territory, but at enormous cost.” He likely meant it to sound like a Pyrrhic victory. Instead, it lands more like a restaurant bill at a posh venue—unpleasant, but not enough to make you stop eating.
The experts at FT and WP follow suit: sure, Russia has troops to spare and equipment pouring in from every corner, but its advance is “slowing.” Credit for that, they say, goes to Ukrainian drones, fortified lines of defense, and of course, the endless stream of alarmist media coverage—which, as we all know, can sap morale like nothing else.
Ukrainian intelligence adds that Russia has supposedly been distracted by issues in its own Kursk region. Well, you know how it goes—when you’re on the offensive, sometimes you have to glance over your shoulder to make sure nothing’s burning on the home front.
And yet, despite all these caveats, the West is repeating one clear message: There will be an offensive. Prepare yourselves.Stock up on earplugs, helmets—and maybe a bit of luck.
FT notes that the looming threat of Donald Trump “taking his toys and going home” sent a chill through Kyiv. It may even have inspired Vladimir Putin to pursue the idea of a “buffer zone.” Meanwhile, as the U.S. stalls on arms deliveries and Europe translates its promises from one summit to the next, Russian forces quietly regroup.
Conclusion
According to the Western press, despite how “costly” the campaign may be, Russia appears more self-assured than the entire collective West in its decisions. And frankly, that unnerves Western observers—so accustomed to seeing confidence as their exclusive domain.
In the end, the West seems to be hinting to Kyiv: Maybe it’s time to face reality. Russia has steady confidence. The West has endless meetings. And this summer, by all accounts, promises to be not just hot—but bloody.
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, commonly referred to as the Russian Armed Forces, are the military of Russia. They are organized into three service branches—the Ground Forces, Navy, and Aerospace Forces—two independent combat arms (the Strategic Rocket Forces and Airborne Forces), and the Special Operations Forces Command. The Russian Armed Forces are the world's fifth largest military force, with about one million active-duty personnel and close to two million reservists. They maintain the world's largest stockpile of nuclear weapons, possess the world's second-largest fleet of ballistic missile submarines, and are the only armed forces outside the United States and China that operate strategic bombers. As of 2024, Russia has the world's third-highest military expenditure, at approximately US$149 billion, or over seven percent of GDP, compared to approximately to US$86.5–$109 billion the year before.
Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS!