Рейтинг@Mail.ru
Pravda.ru

World » Former USSR

Ukraine Made Terrible Mistake When It Decided to Ruin Relations with Russia

11.11.2009
 
Pages: 12
Ukraine Made Terrible Mistake When It Decided to Ruin Relations with Russia

The relationship between Russia and Ukraine are complicated by a number of issues. They include but are not limited to gas supply, the current status of the Russian language in Ukraine, Yushchenko’s intentions to join NATO, the future of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, and heroization of Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and the Ukrainian Rebel Army (URA).

Would positive changes take place if the power in Ukraine was transferred to Victor Yanukovych? Irina Berezhnaya, a delegate of Verkhovnaya Rada of Ukraine (the Ukrainian Parliament), the Party of Regions, shared her thoughts with Pravda.Ru.

- Who is to blame for worsened relationship between Russia and Ukraine?

- Chasing the dream of becoming a member of the EU, Ukraine made a number of irrevocable mistakes in foreign policy. These mistakes include unreasonable unilateral cancellation of visa regime with the European Union, loss of legal argument with Romania regarding Snake Island, and support of Georgia during its war with South Ossetia.

The most unforgivable mistake was aggravating the situation with Russia. Within the last five years, “orange” power in Ukraine did everything possible to worsen its relationship with Russia and continues to do so.

Yushchenko’s policy does not take into account public opinion. According to polls, 41% of Ukrainians believe that the best way out of the crisis is strengthening the economic collaboration with Russia. 14% think that seeking help from the EU is not rational, and 3% think that the USA would not help either.

52% of those polled agree that Ukrainians and Russians share brotherhood.

There is another side to this issue. Some Russian politicians aggravate Anti-Russian attitude in Ukraine by open anti-Ukrainian declamations (for example, by questioning the fact that the Crimea belongs to Ukraine). This is cleverly used by nationalists who portray Russia as an enemy.

Therefore, Russian politicians should stick to constructive expressions and avoid harsh words.

- Is the new “gas crisis” likely to happen in December and January?

- It will occur during the heat of the presidential campaign. Presently the country is swept with the populism of the current government that is trying to do everything in its power to remain in office. It is difficult to forecast its behavior in regard with the gas issue. Complicated situation with Ukraine Oil & Gas that is on the brink of bankruptcy should be taken into account.

Both Russia and Europe understand that construction and maintenance of transit routes bypassing Ukraine would be much more expensive and complicated than modernization of existing routes on Ukrainian territory. However, they would do it because they do not see Ukraine as a reliable partner.

The Party of regions stated several times that this policy must be changed.

I think that the creation of an international gas transmission consortium involving Ukraine, Russia and the EU would be a compromise decision. It would help avoiding a gas collapse.

- What do you think about the situation with the Russian language in Ukraine?

- Our Party supports the idea of granting the Russian language the status of a second official language. This is one of the most important issues in Yanukovych’s campaign. Approximately 46% of the Ukrainian population is Russian-speaking residents, and their language rights must be protected.

I think that in a civilized society the ability to be bilingual means absence of violence in the language area. Within the last five years the officials have been trying to force people to like the Ukrainian language. However, Ukrainian cultural heritage was created centuries ago by our common ancestors and is closely linked to Russia.

Recently, the Ukrainian government announced that the official language in schools must be Ukrainian, and it must be spoken both during lessons and breaks.

Those who are trying to force the Russian language out must be responsible before the future generation. They deny it an opportunity to enjoy our common heritage.

Ukrainian pseudo-patriots are convinced that nationalism and protection of purity of the Ukrainian language means discrimination of the Russian language. This is dangerous thinking.

I think that the solution is simple. The government should take care of the development of the Ukrainian culture to help the young generation to appreciate the Ukrainian language. This is a natural, evolutionary process, and forcing the Ukrainian language on the people by presidential orders is a violation of both the culture and the people.

- What do you think about heroization of OUN and URA ?

- Napoleon Bonaparte used to say: “ History is the version of past events that people have decided to agree upon.” Many post-Soviet countries tried to re-write the history. Ukraine is not an exception . Because of the “orange” power, unbiased analysis of historical events was replaced with nationalistic propaganda.

It split the society into two camps, those “pro” heroization of OUN and those who protects truthful history of theGreat Patriotic War.

Pages: 12
| More
5917

Popular photos

Most popular

Muslims to conquer the heart and soul of Europe
Muslims to conquer the heart and soul of Europe
A quiet Danish town of Odense, the birthplace of the great storyteller Hans Christian Andersen, is close to becoming the arena for clashes between natives and immigrants from Muslim countries. Danish...
Americans get closer to building weapon of the future
Americans get closer to building weapon of the future
The US Navy may have the world's most powerful electromagnetic gun - the so-called railgun - during the forthcoming 15 years. The "Weapon of the 21st Century," as Russian specialists described it, was...
Система Orphus