First off, the above statement used for identifying the nature of a problem is more complex than it seems. It requires a detailed analysis on the part of a full-fledged intellect, which simply cannot exist without examining something carefully and in detail so as to identify its causes, key factors etc. In other words, “pure reason” is prone to finding a problem in all places so that the former may be properly analyzed. As a result, it is also inclined to call into question all kinds of postulates including the above one (“all the females are stupid”), which is seen by many as axiomatic and self-evident.
 |
|
|
 |
| All females are stupid? (tallinn-life.com) |
|
|
|
|
 BREAKING NEWS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First, what is a “female?” Second, how can we define the concept of “stupidity?” Third, does such a high degree of generalization really apply in this case, at least theoretically?
Thus it can be concluded that the above thesis rests on the greatest degree of gender and intellectual categorization, which does not by any means indicate a lack of intellectual powers in each and every representative of the female sex under Homo sapiens sepiensis (rational man possessing reason). In fact, the definition per se implies the mental powers concerned with forming conclusions and judgments.
Taking into account that “all those stupid females” are capable of copulating successfully with the best male representatives of Homo sapiens sepiensis so as to bear young, it is obvious that those of the fair sex are part of the species. On the contrary, all the attempts of certain male representatives of Homo sapiens sapiensis to bear young by breeding with one another ended in failure – a sign of deficiency relating to this kind of sexual combinations.
Here is the conclusion: “all those females” belong to the species of “rational man possessing reason.” Let us then proceed to analyze the definition of “stupidity.”
As for the Russian language, the adjectives stupid or fool have been long used for pointing out one’s lack of sense. We may as well dust off one of the Russian sayings dating back to 19th century: “The bullet is a fool, whereas the bayonet is a fine fellow.” What is this saying all about? Well, the subject has been around from time immemorial. It concerns a blunt spherical object being in opposition to a pointed elongated one. You do not have to be an authority on Freud to figure out that the bullet is isomorphic i.e. being symbolically the same with a womb while the bayonet is isomorphic with a phallus. Please note that reason has nothing to do with the case.
Speak your mind on Pravda.ru forum
Janet Jackson Looking Back at Michael and Herself
Forum
Source: 
