Google+
Рейтинг@Mail.ru
Pravda.ru

Opinion » Columnists

Clinton is a lobbyist, not a diplomat

02.07.2012
 
Clinton is a lobbyist, not a diplomat. 47452.jpeg

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lobbyist who panders to the whims of the business community surrounding Washington, dictating its policy after financing the campaigns of the Presidential candidates. She is not a diplomat. So who the hell is Hillary Clinton to say whether President Assad should go? Was she elected by the people of Syria?

The answer to the question is no, she was not. As a matter of fact she wasn't even elected by the people of the United States of America.

Conducting foreign policy these days is very much providing a diplomatic arm for companies to do business overseas. There is nothing wrong with that. However, creating the conditions for these companies to do business by inventing wars, supporting terrorists and meddling in the internal affairs of sovereign nations, as the USA and its allies tend to do, is unethical, unacceptable and criminal. Hillary Rodham Clinton has blood on her hands, and for this reason she has to go.

The shocking humanitarian and war crimes perpetrated by the United States of America and its FUKUS allies France and the UK were clear for all to see and have been referred to in an indictment sent to The Hague (ICC) and the European Court of Human Rights (*). It matters not whether these legal entities took up the case - everybody knew they would not.

However the law was broken; the USA and its allies used military hardware to strafe civilian targets, they took out the electricity supply, they bombed the water supply, they murdered children in their homes. The terrorists they supported sliced the breasts off women in the streets, decapitated black Libyans, raped girls, impaled boys on stakes, tortured, murdered, committed sodomy, looted, ransacked and burnt down homes.

Hillary Clinton has not been heard to condemn such behaviour. Not once. Probably because she condoned it and as such, is Hillary Clinton not a supporter of terrorists and terrorism? This being the case, she has blood on her hands, and therefore, Hillary Clinton has to go.

 

Fast forward to Syria. What has the United States and its Fukus-Axis allies been doing? Why, aiding, abetting and arming terrorists again. Does Hillary Clinton know what they have done to civilians? Is she aware of the massacres carried out against the Government forces who are doing nothing other than protecting themselves and their country against the Islamist scourge that Hillary Clinton supports?

If you arm terrorists, you have blood on your hands, not the Government forces which try to liquidate this filth. Hillary Clinton for this reason has no authority whatsoever to call for the resignation of President Bashar al-Assad. He is defending himself against the terrorists she launched. She therefore should be the one to go, not him. Hillary Clinton is a lobbyist. She is not a diplomat. She is also a supporter of terrorists.

(*) http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/06-11-2011/119534-indictment_nato-0/

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Pravda.Ru

 

| More
3723

Popular photos

Most popular

Ukraine: Russia 3 NATO 0
Ukraine: Russia 3 NATO 0
Twenty years after the Soviet Union voluntarily dissolved (as provided for in its Constitution), twenty years after the Warsaw Pact was disbanded after promises by NATO not to encroach eastwards...
The second mystery around Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370
The second mystery around Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370
A second mystery around the disappearance of Flight MH370 has largely gone unnoticed: why hasn't the US been in the forefront of providing information about it? The American military has some of most...

Video

Popular photos

Система Orphus